There's been a fair bit of effort to get RISC OS software working on ROOL's port of RISC OS to the Beagleboard and other OMAP-driven boards. The shift from software that works on the Iyonix to software that works on the OMAP family isn't as big as the shift to 32-bit of a few years ago, but there are still some issues. Most importantly, the OMAP family of processors use the 'ARMv7' specification, which means that certain instructions that work on the Iyonix's IOP processor (or earlier) fall over.
The ease of fixing a recalcitrant application depends on how it's been written. If the app's written in BASIC, then all should be well. If it's written in C, then a recompile with the latest version of the GCC or Norcroft tools should fix it. If you've got some hand-crafted assembler to cope with, then the process is a bit more involved. There's a full list of these technical issues
here.
As time goes on, more and more software is having fixes applied to enable compatibility. Over the last few days, David Pilling's
Ovation Pro and
SparkFS have been updated to work with the new hardware. The text editor Zap has
also been fixed, though there's not an official release of this yet. Apps like
NetSurf,
KinoAMP,
ArtWorks and
RDPClient already work, and there's
some indication that EasiWriter and TechWriter will soon join the list.
More details on the applications that work on the new hardware platform can be found
here. Hopefully this list will keep on growing. Meanwhile, at least
one RISC OS user is happy with the experience of using the BeagleBoard...
| |
Software migrates to the Beagleboard port |
| |
hubersn (09:51 9/4/2010)
nunfetishist (10:13 9/4/2010)
hubersn (12:06 9/4/2010)
nunfetishist (13:36 9/4/2010)
flibble (14:31 9/4/2010)
trevj (11:50 9/4/2010)
hubersn (12:02 9/4/2010)
trevj (12:54 9/4/2010)
trevj (12:03 5/7/2010)
|
| |
|
Steffen Huber |
Message #113928, posted by hubersn at 09:51, 9/4/2010 |
Member
Posts: 91
|
Anyone got a migration strategy for Ada code (i.e. GCC 2.7.2 with hand-patched runtime for 32bit compatibility)? |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #113929, posted by nunfetishist at 10:13, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113928 |
 Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
Mechanical conversion to another high-level language?  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Trevor Johnson |
Message #113931, posted by trevj at 11:50, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113928 |
Member
Posts: 660
|
Great stuff.
By the time less 'hobbyist' hardware is available, it looks as if RISC OS users will have a considerable pool of software to choose from. We'd better all keep feeding our piggy banks!
Remember that even those without a development board can contribute to the documentation wiki or donate to help with ROOL's costs. ROOL also plans to have some promotional merchandise for sale at the Wakefield show. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Steffen Huber |
Message #113932, posted by hubersn at 12:02, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113928 |
Member
Posts: 91
|
What are the chances of an Aemulor-like system for backwards compatibility? Or that the unaligned access exception handler would be extended to fix up erronenous accesses?
We have faster hardware, so we should think quick about a way to waste a lot of CPU cycles for emulating old code  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Steffen Huber |
Message #113933, posted by hubersn at 12:06, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113929 |
Member
Posts: 91
|
Mechanical conversion to another high-level language? Actually, there is an Ada compiler available by SofCheck that compiles Ada into (apparently even human-readable) ANSI C, but being an Ada-world product, it is extremely expensive. The pricing in Ada-world just does not account for the development model "one developer, part-time". |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Trevor Johnson |
Message #113934, posted by trevj at 12:54, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113932 |
Member
Posts: 660
|
What are the chances of an Aemulor-like system for backwards compatibility? Although the Aemulor support forum doesn't seem to make any reference to the Beagleboard port, Adrian Lees must already be on the case with this "very early prototype". |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #113936, posted by nunfetishist at 13:36, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113933 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
Actually, there is an Ada compiler available by SofCheck that compiles Ada into (apparently even human-readable) ANSI C, but being an Ada-world product, it is extremely expensive. The pricing in Ada-world just does not account for the development model "one developer, part-time". Time to write your own compiler targeting C, and sell it for slightly less? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Peter Howkins |
Message #113937, posted by flibble at 14:31, 9/4/2010, in reply to message #113936 |
Posts: 892
|
compiles Ada into ANSI C Time to write your own compiler targeting C, and sell it for slightly less?
But don't write it in Ada, else you'll run into recursion issues. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Trevor Johnson |
Message #114777, posted by trevj at 12:03, 5/7/2010, in reply to message #113928 |
Member
Posts: 660
|
...Hopefully this list will keep on growing. For anyone not in the habit of following the ROOL forum, the list referred to in the original article has indeed been recently updated and is populated with plenty of OKs. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
